By Congressional Budget Office
Politichaos
Resolving the Ruckus
Proposition 31 : State Budget
Official title : State Budget. State and Local Government. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute
Summary :
- Establishes two-year state budget cycle beginning in 2015.
- Prohibits Legislature from creating expenditures of more than $25 million unless offsetting revenues or spending cuts are identified.
- Permits Governor to cut budget unilaterally during declared fiscal emergencies if Legislature fails to act.
- Requires performance reviews of all state programs at least once every 5 years.
- Requires performance goals in state and local budgets.
- Requires publication of bills at least three days prior to legislative vote (except for natural disaster and terrorost attack measures).
- Allows local governments to decide how to provide services and instead of implementing state laws/regulations, create "functionally equivalent" procedures.
- Local governments get to decide how property taxes are allocated among local government entities.
Notes:
- Budget:
- Currently budget requires passing by a majority in both houses, 2/3 vote in both houses to increase state taxes.
- State constitution mandates that the overall budget be balanced.
- Under this proposition, if a bill increases spending by over $25M, Legislature must show how it would be offset by other spending reductions and/or revenue increases.
- Exemptions:
- one-time spending for a state department or program
- increase funding for a department or program due to increases in workload or the cost of living
- provide funding required by federal law
- increase the pay or other compensation of state employees pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement
- bills that restore funding to state programs reduced to help balance the state budget in any year after 2008–09
- Under this proposition, if a bill decreases revenues by over $25M, Legislature must show how it would be offset by spending reductions and/or other revenue increases.
- Additional Governor powers:
- Only comes into play if the Legislature does not pass legislation to address a fiscal emergency within 45 days.
- Governor could not reduce spending that is required by the Constitution or federal law (most school spending, debt service, pension contributions, and some health and social services).
- Total amount of the reductions could not exceed the amount necessary to balance the budget.
- The Legislature could override all or part of the reductions by a two-thirds vote in both of its houses.
- Local procedures notes:
- Services included: economic development, education, social services, public safety, and public health
- State funds would be used for the local "functionally equivalent" procedures instead of the state law or regulation.
- Local procedures could be vetoed by the State Legislature
- Local procedures would expire after 4 years.
Proposition 30 : 2012 Budget Agreement - Income and Sales Tax Increases
Official title : Temporary Taxes to Fund Education. Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary :
- CA income tax increased for 7 years for taxable income over $250k (approx 1% of taxpayers = 40% of CA income tax revenue)) from 2012 to 2018:
- single between $250k-$300k, up 1% (now 9.3%)
- joint between $500k-$600k, up 1% (now 9.3%)
- HOH between $340k-$408k, up 1% (now 9.3%)
- single between $300k-$500k, up 2% (now 9.3%)
- joint between $600k-$1M, up 2% (now 9.3%)
- HOH between $408k-$680k, up 2% (now 9.3%)
- single over $500k up 3% (now 9.3%)
- joint over $1M up 3% (now 9.3%)
- HOH over $680k up 3% (now 9.3%)
- single over $1M up 3% (now 10.3%)
- Increases sales and use tax by ¼ cent for 4 years, from 1/1/2013 through 12/31/2016.
- Allocates temporary tax revenues 89% to K–12 schools and 11% to community colleges.
- Permanently excludes the sales tax revenues redirected to local governments from the calculation of the minimum funding guarantee for schools and community colleges.
- Provisions concerning public safety services moved from state to local control in 2011 :
- Guarantees money to local government for public safety services moved from state to local control in 2011.
- Local governments would not be required to implement any future state laws that increase local costs to administer the program responsibilities transferred in 2011, unless the state provided additional money to pay for the increased costs. The measure requires the state to pay part of any new local costs that result from certain court actions and changes in federal statutes or regulations related to the transferred program responsibilities.
- Under the Constitution, the state must reimburse local governments when it imposes new responsibilities or “mandates” upon them. Under current law, the state could be required to provide local governments with additional funding (mandate reimbursements) to pay for some of the transferred program responsibilities. This measure specifies that the state would not be required to provide such mandate reimbursements.
- The Ralph M. Brown Act requires that all meetings of local legislative bodies be open and public. In the past, the state has reimbursed local governments for costs resulting from certain provisions of the Brown Act (such as the requirement to prepare and post agendas for public meetings). This measure specifies that the state would not be responsible for paying local agencies for the costs of following the open meeting procedures in the Brown Act.
Notes :
- Expected to bring in $6 billion annually.
- The 2012-2013 budget passed by the legislature assumes this will pass. If it doesn't, automatic spending cuts will happen to the tune of $6B.
- Proposition 38 also deals with personal income tax increases. If both pass, the tax rate provisions of one with the higher number of votes would be implemented. If Prop 38 gets more votes and both pass, the trigger cuts of $6B would take place.
- Trigger cut details:
- Schools and community colleges (K-14) - $5,354M
- University of California - $250M
- California State University - $250M
- Department of Developmental Services - $50M
- City police department grants - $20M
- CalFire - $10M
- DWR flood control programs - $7M
- Local water safety patrol grants - $5M
- Department of Fish and Game - $4M
- Department of Parks and Recreation - $2M
- DOJ law enforcement programs - $1M
- Public safety services that were transferred from state to local control in 2011 (roughly $6B):
- incarcerating certain adult offenders
- supervising parolees
- providing substance abuse treatment services